“Collusion is not a crime, but that doesn’t matter because there was No Collusion (except by Crooked Hillary and the Democrats)!” — @realDonaldTrump, 7/31/18

- - -

Mathematical Proof(s)

Proof #1:

By the reflexive property of equality, where a = a

We know that crime = crime,

We also know that collusion = collusion,

Thus, clearly we can prove that collusion ≠ crime.

Hence proved.

Proof #2:

By the transitive property of equality where if a = b and b = c, then a = c

Let’s say

shoplifting = crime (a well-known, well-accepted crime, frowned-upon tradition)

and let’s assume

collusion = crime,

it means, shoplifting = collusion.

Hence proved, collusion ≠ crime, collusion is shoplifting (a well known, well accepted, frowned upon tradition).

Proof #3:

By the symmetric property of equality, if a = b, then b =a

So by that logic,

If, collusion = crime,

Then, crime = collusion,

But we know that’s not true. Because, crime = shoplifting (see above)

Hence proved again, collusion ≠ crime.

Language proof

Proof #4:

Collusion: secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

Crime: an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law.

The only similarities are highlighted in bold.

Hence proved, collusion ≠ crime.

Source(s) : Google definition

Scientific Proof

Proof #5:

Newton’s third law of motion clearly states that every action (force) in nature there’s an equal and opposite reaction. So if collusion exists and is a crime, what’s the opposite force to stop it and where is it? Exactly.

Hence, collusion not only is not a crime, it doesn’t even exist. It’s clear that collusion is a myth, a fragment of democratic imagination.

Musical Proof

Proof #6:

Lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala…

Conclusion

Если сговор является преступлением, то есть импичментом, это означает, что по третьему закону движения Ньютона он также не является импичментом, мы также установили, что сговор не является даже преступлением, таким образом, lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala…

Источник (ы): Гугл-перевод Google

Yesli sgovor yavlyayetsya prestupleniyem, to yest’ impichmentom, eto oznachayet, chto po tret’yemu zakonu dvizheniya N’yutona on takzhe ne yavlyayetsya impichmentom, my takzhe ustanovili, chto sgovor ne yavlyayetsya dazhe prestupleniyem, takim obrazom, lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala…

Istochnik (y): Gugl-perevod

Translation: If collusion is a crime that is let’s say impeachable it means that by Newton’s third law of motion it is also equally not impeachable, we have also established that collusion is not even a crime thus. lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala…

Source(s) : Google translation